User talk:Morganmissen

Hello, Morganmissen, and

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 04:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jessica Grose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails to provide non-trivial support for individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 04:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update on this message: despite an improved article, user Reddogsix's nominated it for deletion and was overruled. He was the only user voting to delete it. This user is harassing me despite repeated requests not to contact me, please be careful when interacting with him. Morganmissen (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Grose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Grose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update on this message: user Reddogsix's nomination for deletion was declined by administrators, and the article was kept. He was the only user voting to delete it. This user is harassing me despite repeated requests not to contact me, please be careful when interacting with him. Morganmissen (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SO, I will ask you politely not to remove the comments from the talk page of the article. It really changes the tone of the conversation of the page. The comments should be left there so other editors can note the thought process for the editors involved in the conversation. You are skirting

Again, and last time, you are not permitted to remove another user's comments, or manipulate material toward your personal opinion. This does not change no matter how many times you do this, and will be very clear to other editors and administrators. Morganmissen (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I have removed any of your comments, my apologies - that was not my intent. Please feel free to re-add them; however, please do not remove the other comments. My best to you. reddogsix (talk) 01:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Morganmissen reported by User:Reddogsix (Result: ). Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update on this message: user Reddogsix's report was declined by administrators, given there was no violation. This user is harassing me despite repeated requests not to contact me, please be careful when interacting with him. Morganmissen (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask you very politely and with all due respect to please stop removing the talk page comments from the article. They serve to provide a history of the discussion and will help other editors understand our disagreements. I would suggest you read

If you feel it is necessary to remove it, I strongly encourage you to get a second opinion from an Admin before doing so. Also as a fresh start to the new year, let's try to keep this a non-personal discussion. I certainly will do my best to do so and if you feel I am not acting in the spirit of the Wikipedia community, please let me know. Thanks... reddogsix (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, do not contact me or undo my edits. These personal issues are solely yours, and now that they have been resolved definitively, it's time to move on and leave me alone. Administrators chose to keep this article as you were the only one with personal issues with it, and also chose to decline your report of me, as there was no actual violation. I choose to remove my responses to your complaints and am well within my rights to do so. Everything discussed here is also covered on the AfD and report pages, and those are in tact, so there's no need to involve anyone else again. Needless to say any edit warring will be immediately reported, but you're just wasting everyone's time. Morganmissen (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored your edits per our Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. While you may remove edits from your user talk page as you see fit, your own comments made at article talk pages should not be removed without approval by other contributors to the discussion. By removing your edits you render this public discussion inconsistent, which is why I have restored it. De728631 (talk) 19:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]