User talk:MoroccanEd

Hello Girth Summit, :I am writing to appeal the decision to block my account, MoroccanEd, on the Wikipedia page. In your message, you stated that I have been confirmed to be connected to Jebli18. However, I would like to clarify that I have no relation to this user, and I believe that Jebli18 is a sock puppet who has been using my name and abusing the Wikipedia page. :I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for more than 8 months, and during this time, I have familiarized myself with all of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I have made a conscious effort to ensure that my contributions are always in compliance with these guidelines, and I have always acted in good faith with the best interests of the Wikipedia community in mind. :While it is true that I have edited some of the same articles as Jebli18, I can assure you that this was purely coincidental, as these articles are related to my area of expertise. I have never engaged in any inappropriate behavior, including LOUTSOCKing, and I have always strived to maintain a high standard of quality in my work. :Moreover, I have made numerous valuable contributions to Wikipedia, including several articles that have been featured on the main page. I have received positive feedback from other users, and I am proud of the work that I have done to contribute to the Wikipedia community. :In light of this information, I respectfully request that you review my contributions and reconsider your decision to block my account. I believe that there has been a misunderstanding regarding my connection to Jebli18, and I am confident that if you examine my contributions in detail, you will find that I have acted in good faith and with the best interests of the Wikipedia community in mind. :Thank you for your time and consideration. :Sincerely, :MoroccanEd (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this time you are globally locked, not just blocked on the English Wikipedia, but for cross platform spamming. I do not see any good reason to unblock you, as there was clear socking and promotional editing with your account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia administrators, I am writing to appeal the decision to globally lock my account on Wikipedia and to request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute constructively to the Wikipedia community. I received a response from the administration team informing me that my account was locked due to cross-platform spamming and clear socking and promotional editing. I would like to bring to your attention that I have not engaged in any inappropriate behavior on Wikipedia, nor have I ever been involved in cross-platform spamming or promotional editing. I believe that my previous contributions to Wikipedia demonstrate my commitment to the community and my desire to contribute to the collective knowledge base. I have created several articles, including Fartima Hernadi, Noureddine Bikr, Sidi Zouine, Nour Eddine Tilsaghani, Moga Festival, and Hassan Ben Badida, which have been well-received and have not been flagged for any policy violations. Additionally, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that my articles have been under attack by a user named AnaphoreJT, who has been repeatedly adding a delete;Cross-wiki spam, tag to my articles, resulting in the deletion of some of them. This user has also been blocked for this behavior. I believe that this harassment by @AnaphoreJT is the reason why I have been accused of cross-platform spamming and that this accusation is unfounded. In addition to the aforementioned points, I would like to emphasize that I have been a productive contributor to Wikipedia for the past 8 months, consistently abiding by the platform's policies and guidelines. Throughout this time, I have created several articles that have received positive feedback and have been well-received by the community. My contributions have been recognized by other users, and I have consistently strived to improve the quality of information on Wikipedia. It is important to note that my involvement with @User:Jebli18's article was a one-time occurrence, and it is unjust to conclude that it reflects my overall behavior on Wikipedia. I believe that my previous contributions and the positive reception they have received attest to my dedication to Wikipedia and my commitment to its guidelines. I remain steadfast in my belief that I have been wrongfully accused and unfairly blocked and I humbly request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute to the community in a positive and constructive manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.189.30.44 (talk) 3:20 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4) I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's integrity and quality, and I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe that my previous contributions demonstrate my commitment to the community, and I would like to request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute constructively. I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to globally lock my account and provide me with a clear and concise reason for the decision. If there are any policy violations or issues that need to be addressed, I am more than willing to work with the Wikipedia community to resolve them. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, and I look forward to a prompt response. Sincerely, MoroccanEd 91.189.30.44 (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the