2010

Hi, I added some additional comments at

Thank you very much! Unfortunately, as I said, I don't have the capacity to go into this at the moment. Best, --Morton Shumway (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Morton Shumway. I replied on the Perception discussion page. Alan347 (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks for your encouragment. Alan347 (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fludd's work is important and appropriate to be put down on the perception article.

Alan347 (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --Morton Shumway (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Ok. Thanks. God Bless You. Alan347 (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks—it was my pleasure. Best, Morton Shumway (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

2011

Hi, can we be adult about this? Don't we agree that perception involves an inter-relation of physical (through the senses), imaginative(image), intellectual(the good, the beautiful) and sensible(making sense of fact)? Alan347 (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Our disagreement is not whether perception is a purely physical phenomenon or not, but about the use of a particular image with a certain caption. Before, it was about particular edits to the article in question. I have more than one time tried to open an "adult" discussion, viz. about encyclopedism, writing on Wikipedia, style, content, however you reacted in a rather ignorant manner. Morton Shumway—talk 21:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

]

Psychology Barnstar

Morton, I think you're overdue for this:

		The Psychology Barnstar
		Awarded both for article improvement and for helpful, patient and informed contributions to Talk pages, noticeboards and other discussion MartinPoulter (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my, how nice of you, Martin! – Thank you very much. Also: it's always a pleasure meeting you. Best, Morton Shumway—talk 17:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the notification - Oops. I just wanted the links to go to the section where they were mentioned. You are right, it should have gone to Process and terminology - I will make the change (20040302 (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Good to hear, thank you! Morton Shumway—talk 15:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Since you are aware of those redirects ('Proximal stimulus and Distal stimulus), maybe you can find a reference for those terms from somewhere? A quick google didn't really do much more than point back to WP. (20040302 (talk))

When the right moment comes I am sure I can produce a number of sensible references – I just don't have the capacity to edit a lot at the moment. Kind regards, Morton Shumway—talk 19:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi! I'm a first-year PhD student working on a system to help improve the quality of Wikipedia articles on scientific topics by providing easier access to relevant scientific publications. I was hoping to speak with some editors who work on scientific articles in order to solicit requirements for my system in order to better satisfy the needs of the Wikipedia community. I noticed that you have been a caretaker for a number of pages on topics concerning cognitive science and philosophy, and I would really appreciate your input. If you are interested, please let me know on my talk page (talk). Thanks! —Preceding undated comment added 23:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Morton! Thanks so much for agreeing to help - I decided the easiest way to handle this would be to just post questions on my talk page. Would really appreciate your input - thanks! Sanjaykairam (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current