User talk:Mr. Eisenhower

I just wanted to let you know that I removed the false claim from your user page that you are an administrator here. I have also removed the contents of your user talk page here which you copied from Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower. It will just create confusion. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the material which implied this was anything other than a user talk page (including a fistful of categories). Collect (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr. Eisenhower! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Not sure what you were trying to do here, but it didn't help the article any. —C.Fred (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deli nk (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am warning you, because you're new here. We do not use campaign photos as a substitute to official portraits in nonpolitical entries. Archway (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Archway (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You've repeatedly copied your userpage from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CT_Cooper without

You seem to, maybe, be a newer editor here. You might wish to review our policies and guidelines, which can be, frankly, a bit overwhelming for new editors, or, when your block expires, drop a few messages over at Wikipedia:Teahouse regarding any questions you might have and how to deal with problematic situations that might arise. John Carter (talk) 01:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your ability to edit this page while you are blocked, as you are abusing the privilege. Please do not do this again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mr. Eisenhower. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 05:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Any admin can unblock without consulting me, if we get some sort of credible response here. Mr. Eisenhower, at the very least you need to show some sign that you are reading and understanding what people are trying to tell you here, and give some assurance that you will stop the repeated bizarre behaviour that resulted in this block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice Mr Eisenhower, notwithstanding your right to remove stuff your page, can I suggest that doing so as you are is not the best way of showing an potentially-unblocking administrator "some sign that you are reading and understanding what people are trying to tell you," etc? Showing you understand through communication is the way forward!

^Pocketed 16:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

User now indef blocked. [1] --Guy Macon (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]