User talk:MrBosnia

You must understand there is only ONE other entity apart from the Republic of Srpska and the Federation, it is the Brcko District. There is no such thing as fourteen entities in BiH. After the Dayton Agreement, two principal entities were formed: RS 49% and FBH 51%, along with a third entity which is compromised in both RS and Fed. Here is a map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Map_Bih_entities.png

I therefore hope you will stop editing the useful information on the Bosnia & Herzegovina page and stop misinformating our users. User:Boris4c 01:25, 6 November 2007 (CET)

Please note that you reverted multiple editors changes, all with an edit summary that made it appear you were only removing a single editor's changes. [1] --

Ronz 01:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

The game versus Poland was fully official for Bosnia and Herzegovina nationale football team. The FIFA put this game in official fixtures calendar . They don't publish unofficial ones . No matter they played in the strongest team or youth . If the papers were sent to FIFA the game is fully official. Bartekos (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I don't have a MySpace. ♠K | ☢ 06:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not rever the removal of images and cleanup efforts of

Pa kretenu, jes' ti glup ili sta je s tobom? Jebem te u sljivu, danas Ciro objavio spisak a ti se pravis budala i pojebajes stranicu nase Repke, stidi se!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 18:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo rotalju,

ko si ti matere ti, neki cetnik sto zabotira repku ili sta? Brines se o artiklu nase repke a ne znas koje pozvan, nesto mi je tu suhveli? Ali, zato sto smo mi bosanci fini ljudi evo ti link: [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 15:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evo matere ti, kad si tako sjeban u tintari da ne znas nac ili neces, pravis se budala, evo, evo serem ti se usta: [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjecnobordo (talk • contribs) 11:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason behind this revert? BanRay 15:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left him a message, he said he had a source so I'm somewhat confused. BanRay 21:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re [4]: No material was removed - tags like this are a way of asking other editors to find and add sources to articles. Knepflerle (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to