User talk:MrFijiax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello MrFijiax!

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started
  • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user
  • How to:
    start an article
Policies and guidelines

User community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!  Netsnipe  ►  06:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Warnings

Welcome to

welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. GB 12:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of
Golden Dalek

An editor has nominated

bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

An editor has nominated

bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--cjllw | TALK 06:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please note that an existing page exists for Doctor Who series. Accordingly, your article regarding series 5 episodes will be listed for deletion. MojoTas 07:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --OZ OO (vote saxon) 17:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Spawn of the Red Lake Wolf

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The Curse of the Red Lake Wolf has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Attribution for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing reliable sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J.M.C Hoult

I have added a "{{

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn/ talk 11:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

List of Doctor Who monsters and aliens

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --OZ OO (vote saxon) 12:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 06:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Golden Dalek itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on Flash(Doctor Who), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article about a non-exsistant television episode

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. OZ OO (vote saxon) 11:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

List of Doctor Who serials, you will be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 07:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading

speedy deletion
since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are

case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

License tagging for Image:Image-DURID.jpg

Thanks for uploading

image description page
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Image-Image-DURID.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Image-DURID.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Image-Druids- Animalkin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bloodlust(Doctor Who), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

obviously this has to do with Doctor Who but there's no context to indicate what kind of program this is

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 06:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on The Plastic Man, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

obviously this has to do with Doctor Who but there's no context to indicate what kind of program this is

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 06:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hoaxes

do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Tim! 18:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

External link

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Bl ue 07:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Superior Poison, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. MKoltnow 06:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Cathibar

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Blocked

You have now been blocked under further notice for the continued and disruptive creation of

not, you are free to appeal your block. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daemon (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daemon (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]