User talk:Mudgineer

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

You are quite welcome. And feel free to help yourself to some milk if you find any laying around! :-) Nazgul533 ^{talk contribs} 23:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest you merge any content from this article into the main article

Hi there

I noticed your recent edit of calcium carbonate. I have a few questions; perhaps you can explain?

1. I don't think the "test" you have listed is appropriate for this section of the article. The tone of that section is not appropriate either -
   WP is not a howto
   .
2. I don't understand why you replaced a properly formatted citation into a simple link which goes to a subscription-only site.
3. The Farsi inter-wiki looks correct. I suppose you have a reason for removing it?

--Rifleman 82 (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Rifleman, you must have me confused with someone else. I didn't add that section you are referring to. I added a definition of its use in the oil industy. I may have corrected some spelling or grammatical errors, though.

Mudgineer (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mud balance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guoguo12--Talk--  14:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The article Pressure shale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NOT#GUIDE

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Directional well has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition

WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffetalk 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]