User talk:Mujhideen101
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
]
Please do not add or change content without
reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
]
August 2012
Hello, and
Soviet war in Afghanistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page
.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be
three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Facts, not fiction (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
]
]
You have been Unblock Ticket Request System. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)]
- I commented here. Remember, editing here is not a WP:NPOV or you will be blocked. My very best wishes (talk) 04:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)]
Blocked for sockpuppetry
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC) |
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mujhideen101 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Facts, not fiction (talk) 10:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
]
Blocked for sockpuppetry
illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mujhideen101 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
]
Blocked for sockpuppetry
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rschen7754 00:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC) |
Blocked for sockpuppetry
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC) |