User talk:Musophil

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dylan620 _{Efforts · Toolbox} 10:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... is it still tagged? I don't really understand what the problem is - I'm very new to this. I've added some more info to it in an attempt to save it, but I don't really know what I'm doing so I'd be most grateful if anyone could help. Thanks in advance. Phil Musophil (talk) 15:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the CSD nomination was declined a while back. However, there are still issues with the article that are displayed in the box at the top of the page. Consider reading the links given there for more information. Good luck!

Beta) 16:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I responded to your question about non-notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LITE (band).--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 19:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vipinhari || talk 16:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

]

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveIsInTheAir.jpg

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveIsInTheAircanvas2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveIsInTheAirprint2000.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Is In The Air (Flower Thrower, Flower Chucker, Rage) (February 3)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Love Is In The Air (Flower Thrower, Flower Chucker, Rage) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Love Is In The Air (Flower Thrower, Flower Chucker, Rage)

Hello, Musophil. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Love Is In The Air

".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –

Jay 10:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]