User talk:NUMIDICUS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

March 2024

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Arab migrations to the Maghreb, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection
.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Icosium. Skitash (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NUMIDICUS (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The official embassy websites of algeria that I posted using the official data of the algerian republic talk one thing about the the naming of the Capital algiers, the other user is using fictional references for the naming of the capital, please refer to references that I posted and make the the page follow the official data

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NUMIDICUS (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

block evasion. It was already problematic when you did it before the block, but it's now simply strictly prohibited and would make an unblock extremely unlikely. Contributions made in violation of a block may be freely undone by anyone. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The block isn't a problem at all, I am just asking you, The algerian embassies and Algerian government recognizes the name Algiers as given to it by Bellughin ben Ziri, I am simply asking you to correct the information on that page and keep me blocked and also keep the page protected, the other user sabotaged an official data of the algerian government and I am simply saying just look into it please. NUMIDICUS (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]