User talk:NajyaAzzahShamon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

April 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Jason Bateman have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your user page to user space

Greetings! It looks like you tried to create a user page at Usuari:NajyaAzzahShamon; I've moved it to the correct title, User:NajyaAzzahShamon. —C.Fred (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of user page and user talk page

I have removed the content you posted here, as it was a blatant

user talk page
, and its purpose is to draw your attention or discuss your edits. All discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier.

Your

autobiography. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

July 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators:
IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]