User talk:Neilho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Welcome!

Hello, Neilho, and

Whitehaven Amateurs F.C., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines
for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

helpme
}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion of
Whitehaven Amateurs F.C.

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (November 12)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
reliable sources
that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (November 14)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 14:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Neilho, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 14:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (November 18)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission does not appear to be written in
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 04:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Neilho. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Neilho|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 10:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (November 20)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
reliable sources
that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gill Fielding
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gill Fielding. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 08:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (December 4)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission does not appear to be written in
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (December 9)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission does not appear to be written in
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (January 5)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission does not appear to be written in
peacock terms
that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gill Fielding
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gill Fielding. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning on undisclosed paid editing

You told me back in November that you weren't being paid to write Draft:Gill Fielding and yet I notice that her company is listed as a client on a website of a freelance writer with the same name as you and someone of the same name has written a book with her. That's beyond coincidence and if you continue to fail to disclose your conflict of interest you will be blocked from editing. You've already wasted considerable amounts of volunteer's time. SmartSE (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the COI template to the Gill Fielding page, but not the paid one as I continue to insist I am not being paid to write this article. In fact, to accuse me of lying and publicly outing me in this manner could be construed as
WP:HAR. However, I do respect your intentions SmartSE
and probably should have been more forthcoming about my COI in this article so probably have myself to blame. For public record I still insist the subject is notable and that the current version of the article is 100% neutral and tied to the references. It is sad to see some other editors jumping in with the most spurious attacks now that the MfD discussion has been instigated but I guess that's human nature. Now that I am aware I shouldn't have even attempted to write the article myself I will be looking to advocate on the subjects behalf and would appreciate if a friendly editor would take up the challenge when the dust has settled. This has been my most trying experience on Wikipedia to date but I guess it's all a learning experience.

Neilho (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Fielding (January 24)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:
This submission appears to
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devopam (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Gill Fielding

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Gill Fielding during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Neilho. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neilho. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neilho. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neilho&oldid=1187203656"