User talk:Nevalex

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

Magic.Wiki (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.

However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list.

--Orange Mike | Talk 14:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nevalex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this was not intention to spam wiki in anyway, I asked a question in my talk page and it was ignored, then account block. I would really appreciate, if you could unblock my account. thanks!

Decline reason:

You won't be unblocked until you acknowledge that you understand why you were blocked in the first place and agree not to continue using Wikipedia for promotion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nevalex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I confirm I do understand the reason for being blocked and agree with Wiki's policies.

Decline reason:

The block template says "and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy". This username is not allowed per our

username policy. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of User:Kotsclefa/Itransition

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Kotsclefa/Itransition during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nevalex

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion

, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Cabayi (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]