User talk:Nick Hill

Welcome!

Hello, Nick Hill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started

Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of BitcoinZ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zazzysa (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide
independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines
. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references of any kind.

There was nothing in your text that indicated how this topic met our notability criteria. There's just a description, but no facts at all to show why this product, created just a few months ago, has any significance here.

Articles must be neutral, encyclopaedic and

non-promotional

tone. Just describing the product without references or any indication of why it should have a place here looks like a promo. we get many software "articles" that tell us all the features, but nothing about sales, faults or whatever

I've seen your comments at the COI noticeboard, and you appear to be editing in good faith, but I'm declining your request to restore because a version exists at Draft:BitcoinZ, and you can't have two live versions of the same article. FWIW, the deleted text read BitcoinZ is an Bitcoin-like cryptocurrency incorporating ZK-Snark based private transactions. The code is based on a fork of Zcash. The blockchain is not a fork, and began with a new genesis block on 9th September 2017. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]