User talk:Nicoljaus

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 13:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff 1 Revision as of 14:20, 23 April 2024

Diff 2 Latest revision as of 14:45, 23 April 2024

The above edits in the space of half an hour are a clear breach of the 1 revert rule, kindly self revert. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm so sorry. I need to bring in this area a couple of friends to make reverts instead ne. Nicoljaus (talk) 15:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance. Zero^talk 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a counter edit and removed "Palestinian". It was your group that violated 1RR Nicoljaus (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's a no. Selfstudier (talk) 15:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for edit warring, and intent to game 1rr, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

In fact Selfstudier made revert instead of Zero0000, I talked about it. Anyway, okay. Nicoljaus (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for a Wikipedia account for Hiba Abu Nada to add it to Wikidata. I couldn't find it, so I did a little research. The reference in the article indicated that she participated in some WikiWrites(?) project. I didn’t find such a project, but I found the WikiRights project: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/ويكيبيديا:ويكي_رايتس. It was organized by a certain Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor. I read the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor article and didn't see any outside perspective, "controversy" or anything like that, just self-representation. I surfed the Internet and instantly found information that must be in the article to comply with the NPOV. I started adding [1], everything went well for two days. Then:

12:53, 23 April 2024 - Zero0000 made a complete cancellation of all additions [2]
13:14, 23 April 2024 - (20 minutes later!) Selfstudier wrote on my TP [3]
14:20 - 14:22, 23 April 2024 -‎ With two edits (first, second) I partially took into account the comment of Zero0000 about "ethnic marking", but returned the last [4].
14:27, 23 April 2024 (7 minutes later!!) Selfstudier makes a second complete cancellation of all my edits, blaming POV editing [5]
14:45, 23 April 2024‎ - I’m returning the version where I partially took into account Zero0000’s comments (removed "ethnic marking")[6]
15:10, 23 April 2024 - Selfstudier accuses me of 1RR breach. In the dialogue, I explained that the group that really violated the rule was Selfstudier&Zero0000, who obviously acted in close coordination. My first undo was part of a counter edit User talk:Nicoljaus#1RR_breach
15:41, 23 April 2024 Selfstudier writes on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement [7]
16:10, 23 April 2024 (30 minutes later!) ScottishFinnishRadish issues an indefinite block [8]. No opportunity to write my “statement”, as well as an extremely bad faith interpretation of my remark as "an intent to game 1rr".
16:15, 23 April 2024 - Whitewashing completed [9]

Ramy Abdu, 8 October 2023: "Successive generations will remember you, and history will immortalize you as heroic knights who created for us pure glory, not stained with mud". [10]

Nicoljaus (talk) 08:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]