User talk:Niemeyerstein en

Hi Niemeyerstein en, After I added some suggestions to these articles, I am now confused. It appears that after that, you have edited unrelated articles I have worked on. Would you like to talk to me so that I can understand? Thank you, Widefox (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed all of your edits to these articles...

Preimplantation genetic haplotyping

I have reverted your edit [1] as I these are covered in the article referenced. If you do not agree, please let me know. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schmidt Sting Pain Index

This edit [2] is not justified, and is already covered by the tag. I have reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starr sting pain scale

The edit [3] helped me put the original ref in, as well as the book ref - thank you. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pain scale

fair enough. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Petname

This edit [4] was reverted by someone else. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Type Range Registers

The 3 edits were not useful and were reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dolorimeter

These 2 edits were not useful and were reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scoville scale

Did not agree - the edit was reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

summary

Although you are free and entitled to edit any articles in WP, I cannot explain why you have chosen to edit these particular articles right after I have commented on the (Real-time location) articles. Please could you explain this, as it makes me feel slightly uncomfortable. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In your user page you say

"Please stand off altering the flavours of the presentation from critical appraisal to e.g. covering the truth, which is not desired."

Please read and absorb:

I have nominated RTLS implementing, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTLS implementing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ikluft (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated RTLS communications, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTLS communications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ikluft (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Location (topology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and vague article whose contents are already covered properly at Topology and Graph theory. There is no suitable content to merge, and the article name is an implausible search term.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

The article Unilateration is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unilateration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Protonk (talk) 00:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Nomination of

Locating

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locating until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

]

Nomination of

Locating engine

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locating engine (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 11:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]