User talk:NikosAstroul

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Course of Freedom, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ιm really not enganged in any disruption, I have added content providing sources , I have specified the reasons for all the undoing of User:Vif12vf's blanket removals so far and then User:Vif12vf is the one engaged in disruption by undoing and removing it all with zero specification as to why their removals are justified , besides blanket and vague statements about the party "not being left-wing", which may refer to the infobox edits, but their removals also target well-articulated and well-sourced information on the Ideology and Position sections NikosAstroul (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-establishment may under no circumstances be added to the position-section of the infobox. The infobox does not need more sources and as a matter of fact, it is always preferred that sources are kept out of the infobox and instead covered in the main body. Lastly, YouTube may not be used as a source! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have your answer to your zero-explanation blanket undoings, and misuse of warnings in the Talk of Course of Freedom. Check the edit history as well. Despite the harsh criticism I am acting in good faith and haven't reincluded the anti-establishment in the infobox pol. position, but I've put back everything else NikosAstroul (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The new edit is satisfactory. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to have an opinion as to why my

"Political Position: Anti-establishment Nominally: Left-wing" (as the Kathimerini source describes as only "nominally on the left") wasn't a satisfactory one? I think it would be a good compromise on our differing opinions on the matter. Perhaps you could check on the Talk page where my full list of arguments are shown. Tho I'm glad you found my edit satisfactory so far, I know im an S.P.A. but i'm trying to act in good faith and objectivity as you can see NikosAstroul (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]