Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
I have nominated Colin Pearson (1943-), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Pearson (1943-). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article Enterprise Reader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cricket umpire lever counter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricket umpire lever counter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The decision to merge was undertaken via a deletion discussion, which can be found here. If you wish to dispute the outcome, please visit Wikipedia:Deletion review. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]