User talk:Oceanflynn/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Planetary boundaries

Affordability of housing in Canada

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as

Affordability of housing in Canada, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from your site http://oceanflynn.wordpress.com/2011/05/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to beblocked
from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at

Talk:Affordability of housing in Canada saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Note that although the url above is the primary source of much of the copyvio, the article also appears to contain copypasting from other sources as well, e.g.http://chra.olasoft.com/document/535/2007%20Lack%20of%20Affordable%20Housing1IFH-1282008-2232.pdf. See also my comments atTalk:Affordable housing. Voceditenore (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Added Creative Commons License to My Personal Blog Post

Attribution-ShareAlike
CC BY-SA

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to “copyleft” free and open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use. This is the license used by Wikipedia, and is recommended for materials that would benefit from incorporating content from Wikipedia and similarly licensed projects.

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0"> View License Deed</a> | <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode"> View Legal Code</a>

Is this enough?

I do try to use resource references scrupulously but may have made errors. I do not want to lose my editing rights! I work hard at my contributions seeking out the most legitimate resources and adding details to existing references including the most up-to-date urls.

I use my personal blog speechless as a way of keeping track of materials I have added to wikipedia as the wikipedia article is organic, dynamic and always changing. For my own research purposes I do not want to lose valuable references, citations, links etc. I use detailed webliographies and bibliographies on my personal blog as well. oceanflynn 21:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

The licence at http://oceanflynn.wordpress.com/2011/05/ resolves the main problem with
Affordability of housing in Canada, which I have now un-hidden. It also resolves one of the issues raised at Talk:Affordable housing, but it won't resolve the matter of the blog apparently plagiarising at least one other source. – Fayenatic London 07:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
I've left some further comments about this issue at ]

Hi. I noticed that you may have removed a couple of cited sources from Cosmopolitanism. Next time, it would be preferable if you were to specify a reason. Or, you can use the article's talk page to discuss the edit beforehand. Your edit has been reverted. Thank you.Cardinal Direction (talk) 16:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I must have deleted it by error when inserting the following quotation. Glad you caught it and reverted the delete. The reference was needed there. oceanflynn 19:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)