User talk:OhWhyNot

OhWhyNot, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OhWhyNot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Paranoia

Yes I'm a paranoid man. Thanks for nothing, Anon :) I'll be visiting the TeaHouse shortly. 05:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Third-wave feminism page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 00:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Potentially controversial content about living persons requires highly reliable sourcing

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As linked above,

reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight - peer reviewed academic papers, major newspapers, books from traditional publishers (not vanity presses/self published). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I left a message on your talk page, and you censored it. OhWhyNot (talk) 02:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll use The Guardian instead. It's a liberal newspaper, so you should be happy. OhWhyNot (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not

WP:BLPN. However, continuting to add such material to the article may lead to a block. Johnuniq (talk) 02:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Lawls. I added a source to the "Not my Kind of Girl" section. Jesus. The

repressive tolerance you two demonstrate is so obvious. What you see as ridiculous, I see as important . OhWhyNot (talk) 02:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]