User talk:Oliwiasocz
New message from MrBauer24
Message added 02:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
MrBauer24 (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Thank you so much for your article Julius von Szymanowski it is fantastic! MrBauer24 (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
A cup of coffee for you!
|
What a lovely article and translation (Self-portrait at 69 years). Interesting that the Polish article is so much more developed than the Spanish one! Klbrain (talk) 20:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oliwiasocz. Thank you for your work on
I'm unsure about the title here -- should it definitely be "Timothy (Szretter)" and not "Timothy Szretter"? I see it's the first on Russian wikipedia and the second on German wikipedia. Usually Orthodox clergy articles are just their religious name and their birth surname, no parentheses.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Moriwen (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
|
Thanks for the helpful translation of Julius von Szymanowski! Klbrain (talk) 22:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oliwiasocz. Thank you for your work on
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oliwiasocz. Thank you for your work on
Thanks for the translation! If you have access to sources, it would be great if you could add more references to the page, several sections are mostly unsourced.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Broc (talk) 09:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
1935
Was there a special reason why your edit was marked as 'minor'?Ttocserp 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Content forking Slavs in Lower Pannonia
Please review Wikipedia:Content forks. Likewise, by the editing of the two redirects, it's clear that you were aware or became aware of the existence of the previous article. This not the way to act in a known contentious topic area. (I'll send you the standard warning for that after this message.) --Joy (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason I'm particularly concerned is that this is 36 kilobytes of text that would need to be reviewed by reviewing Polish Wikipedia editor histories and edit summaries, after we already have 43 kilobytes of text on the same topic over here. This is just a pointless burden on the English Wikipedia volunteers. If you want to introduce some text that may be missing in the existing article, please feel free to do that, in edits that are clearly described in edit summaries and attributed specifically so we know they weren't e.g. written by some long-term-abuse sockpuppet years ago. --Joy (talk) 07:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Likewise, there's been a lot of discussions over the years, you can see it in the talk pages of the pages you edited like Talk:Principality of Lower Pannonia or Talk:Slavs in Lower Pannonia. The matter of what constituted the principality, do we talk just about the Croatian aspects, and whatnot, have a history of ruffling feathers, so this approaching this topic without examining these various pitfalls would not be advisable at all. --Joy (talk) 07:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
--Joy (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Your translations from Polish
Hi there, Oliwiasocz, and thank you for all these articles which you have translated from Polish. I realize you are a paid OKA editor but your work is nevertheless impressive. I have rated them nearly all as B class and look forward to many more in the coming weeks and months. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Oliwiasocz. Thank you for your work on Kyiv Caves Patericon. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)