User talk:Oub
This is a test.
Moved back
Hi Oub, I've taken the liberty to move your talk page back to where it belongs (i.e., from User talk:Oub2 to User talk:Oub). Kind regards, —
- Hi Mark, thanks! I once moved that page, but did not know how to move it back. Oub 19:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC):
The Passion
I removed the paragraphs in question because speculating on how a director might have done it differently is non-encyclopedic and OR. Your points are interesting, and you may notice I kept the paragraph about there being no Passion narrative in the Gospels (moved it up into the "source material" section. Thanks for commenting - Her Pegship 16:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
March 2008
- Re: Scarian thanks for your reaction. I have answered in detail on the talk page of OOXML, which I think is better suited for this dispute. I must also add a sad observation, since OOXML is a highly political subject, at the end of the month there will be a voting about it becoming an ISO standard and given the fact that according to various sites http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070123.gtmsft0123/BNStory/Technology/home microsoft looks for support of its case in a rather unconventional manner, one should be very careful.Oub (talk) 14:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC):]
- To be absolutely honest, I'm not interested in content disputes. You can take all of this to ScarianCall me Pat16:20, 10 March 2008 (ETC)
- Re: ]
[1] - That sort of editing behaviour contradicts what you are saying, friend. Please do not revert anymore on that contentious issue. I am obliged to give you another warning for edit warring. Please stop. Use discussion. Thank you. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
- Re: Scarian Look you called for a break and we were discussing the issue, then suddenly Warren popped up and deleted the entire section without contributing to the discussion. I explicitly complained about his behavior in your talk page before undoing the edit. To make it clear it is not the fact that this entire section was deleted was a bad solution, I would have even agreed with it, it was the fact that Warren acted like this. That you give me the warning and not him, I find strange to say the least. Oub (talk) 10:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC):]
- I have done so now. Sorry for the delay. (Additionally, I have requested that someone [anyone] file for ScarianCall me Pat 13:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)]
- Re: Scarian thanks, wouldn't it be consequent to revert User:Warren 's edit then, since he did that without discussion? Oub (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC):]
- Re:
- I have done so now. Sorry for the delay. (Additionally, I have requested that someone [anyone] file for