User talk:Oz1cz

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aghapy_TV

Please see the discussion at Category talk:Amateur Radio Operator for a discussion on how to identify Hams and Ham personalities on Wikipedia. Steve Kd4ttc 02:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have added the template to my page. --Oz1cz 18:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have listed yourself as a licensed

]

Request for review

I will soon create a new article with more extensive tables for converting between the Julian and Gregorian calendar. It is presently at User:Jc3s5h/sandbox4. I would appreciate it if you would look it over, since I know you are interested in calendars. --Jc3s5h (talk) 16:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have done so and commented on the discussion page.--Oz1cz (talk) 19:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you commented intelligently on

. If you check out the Discussion page, at the bottom you'll see the argument I've gotten into with a non-logged-in IP user who refuses to allow edits to his pet article. He insists that what he calls the "Exigian" calendar, which changes the Gregorian rule for '00 leap years, is the correct reckoning to use, and keeps reverting my efforts to make the article accurate for both Julian and Gregorian dates. My position is that if the article is to exist, it must at least cover the Gregorian calendar that is widely accepted throughout the world. If there were consensus to also include this "Exigian" proposal, (which not only has never been adopted by any country, scientific, religious, or other standards body, but doesn't even have an article on Wikipedia) that would be one thing, but it cannot cover this speculative system to the exclusion of the existing world standard. So far, it's been a one-on-one dispute, and before I resort to asking for arbitration, I'd like to get some other editors involved in the discussion. Maybe if a few of the knowledgeable editors from ]

I've noticed that jc3s5h has done some cleaning in the article. Judging from the comments made by the anonymous contributor, I don't think reasoning will work with this guy. If the problem persist, I think you have a good case for requesting the page to be protected.--Oz1cz (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too, but until jc3s5h stepped in, the anonymous contributor could point to some kind of "consensus" derived from the fact that no one but me had noticed anything wrong with the article recently, and I was wrong for trying to improve the article by making it correct w/r/t Gregorian calendar rules.The Monster (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Am I missing something here? Is it so difficult for The Monster to include a simple note saying that the Gregorian calendar repeats itself every 400 years? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.174.154 (talk) 16:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are missing something. The issue is not the 400 year cycle, but the addition of references the non-existent Exigian calendar.

Also, I would recommend that you get yourself a Wikipedia account. Hiding behind an anonymous IP address does not improve credibility.--Oz1cz (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Clt1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

]

Fixed --Oz1cz (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a date (or, rather, a year) to the picture. Is that what is missing?--Oz1cz (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're looking for Exodus 12:2. Alephb (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]