User talk:PPP

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

(Archived talk page can be found here)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Edits were in good faith, in fact it was predominantly User: Roger 8 Roger who was edit warring (reported on WP:AN3), violating WP:WTRMT for which they have been warned. PPP (talk) 11:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Edit warring is not acceptable, even if the edits were made in good faith. See also

WP:NOTTHEM

. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 12:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As said, it wasn't me who started edit warring. What I did was replace a maintenance template that was repeatedly removed without consensus. Before being reported, I hadn't made any change to the page

WP:NOTTHEM is hard to uphold when an edit warrer reports me for edit warring. I was nominated purely because some user(s) didn't want me to add correct information to the given article. Note: five users on Talk:Netherlands voted against the current text on Netherlands, so please don't pretend it's just me. PPP (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

It doesn't matter who started it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.