or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Please use edit summaries and Show preview button more often. --Gurubrahma 18:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting
I saw your comment on an edit summary. Have a look at
WP:REVERT for instructions. --GraemeL(talk) 21:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Image copyrights
I see you've uploaded Image:Sdkfz 002.jpg and indicated that the copyright holder has released the image for any use. I can't find anything on the website you gave as the source indicating this is the case -- the closest is a clear statement of "all rights reserved". Could you tell me why you think the copyright holder has released all rights? --Carnildo 04:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Carnildo, thanks for the heads up. I thought i saw something in that page that would have all rights were released. Im sorry. I'll be more careful next time. Do you have the link to the information page for the image rulings and copyrights? paat 13:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? --Carnildo 18:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Would there be an article in Wikipedia to help me chose which rights or rules would work best for images i upload for article? paat 20:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's no central location for this. Probably the best place is
Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags for asking any questions you might have. --Carnildo 19:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks, well i have a quick question, you might be able to answer. I am a student from
école Garneau, and I am one of the students that work on the website; www.escgarneau.com (i think its down now, but is probably up when u will read this). For any pictures that i take to work on articles, ex.: GuG, what kind of copyright tag do i put, since for some pictures, I am half the author, since we someitmes work many on it, and i know that any picture on the site is really free for anyone to use? paat 22:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
That's a tricky one. If you created the picture for something other than your official work on the website, then most likely you own the copyright on it, and you can pick whatever free license you want (I recommend the Creative Commons Share-Alike Attribution license). If you created the picture as part of your official work on the school website, then the school probably owns the copyright, and you'd need to ask permission to use it on Wikipedia. --Carnildo 07:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Check out Talk:Garneau User Group. I think we're going to have to merge our article. But At least in the future you won't have to face stupid (and often anoying) deletionist actions. Just send a comment to user:Neutrality as discussed in the garneau user group talk page. --CyclePat 21:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Pogge13.jpg
Thanks for uploading
copyright tag
, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Poutine 2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
I just now noticed that you asked way back in March which goal they played in the background at the "first nation of hockey" line in the old "I am Canadian" ads in response to my comment that it was the greatest ever. It was Paul Henderson's goal in Game 8 of the Summit Series with 34 seconds left on the clock, winning the series for Canada. - dharmabum 22:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but didn't we just tie the series 4-4, having won only 1 game in Canada, but winning three games (including the last one) in Russia? paat 01:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright problems with Image:Sdkfz 001.JPG
An image that you uploaded, Image:Sdkfz 001.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
No prob. Picture's gone :) paat 01:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright problems with Image:Sdkfz 002.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Sdkfz 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
No prob. Picture's gone :) paat 01:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FILMS Newsletter
The
November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Stronghold: Crusader
If you are still up for it, I'd be willing to collaborate with you on creating a "Stronghold: Crusader" article. --RenegadeReplicant|leave me a message 22:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW(talk) 21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
do not attack other editors. Thank you. FiggyBee 00:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
To me, it seems more to defend myself directly from an inderect attack. Either way. That user hasn't started on the good foot, and i don't think he'll get any better. But either way, point taken, thank you FiggyBee paat 00:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Films Newsletter
The
January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The
March 2007 issue
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023talk 00:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The
April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
Dear Paat! You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up as a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. The purpose of this newsletter is to update on the goings on of the project, as there have been major changes, and a lot of new recognized content in the past few weeks. If you are an inactive user, you probably won't recognize the new and improved state of the WikiProject!
In the past few weeks, there has been quite heated discussion about the use of diacritics in article name. The current guideline is using diacritics in the pages of articles of all player names which require them, but redirects are exempt.
By Maxim
There have been two new task forces started within the WikiProject to coordinate major topics.
Sweden Ice Hockey task force
This task force was initiated by
Featured article status. It covers all Swedish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles, players and coaches that are Swedish, or have played/coached for a Swedish club, and arenas in Sweden. They plan to eventually operate as a sort of a sub-project, which will have its own articles for creation, ranking importance and quality of articles, and co-ordinate article improvement. Its current members are Krm500, Bamsefar75, and CLAES
Featured Topic status. Although it currently meets the required article count, the task force wishes to improve it further. Its area of coverage is very similar to the Sweden Ice Hockey task force. Its members are Bsroiaadn, JHMM13, FutureNJGov, Sportskido8, Michael Greiner, JRWalko, and Soxrock
. The page has been quite popular; since it was created on July 21, there have been six completed requests. There are four currently outstanding requests:
By Maxim
On July 12, Kaiser matias announced that he had completed assessing all the articles with a {{ice hockey}} tag, sorting them into Category:Unassessed Ice Hockey articles. Kaiser matias has ranked about 9000 articles in that category, and most were stubs, and "have no information at all", according to him. Everybody is encouraged to expand the stubs into real articles. This effort took around 5 months. A big thanks goes to Kaiser matias from me and all the project.
Note: You have received this newsletter because you have added your name
Animum Delivery Bot
(delivered on 19:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)).
[reply]
August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
WikiProject Films
roll call
Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the
task forces
that you may be interested in joining as well.
Also,
Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!
Dear Paat! You are receiving as you are a member of
WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in August, there's been great changes. Read on to find out! Maxim(talk)
This just in:
featured list status, while the bot was delivering the newsletter. Maxim(talk) 02:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
has been given A-Class status due to multiple issues raised at FLC.
^The last one, List of Calgary Flames players, is the only one not associated with the featured topic drive.
WP:FLC
and 2 lists in the "Holding cell", as there's been an accepted guideline to not put more that 5 trophy lists at the same time to, "compensate for the sanity of the reviewers".
project page if you are interested in helping out. Although it's closer to being done than not, there's still work to be done. The next topic that might be tackled is Stanley Cup
, but this remains purely speculative and in discussion.
Note: You have received this because your name is on
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that
special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LesTroisAccords1.jpgThanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Replaceable fair use Image:Pogge13.jpgReplaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading Image:Pogge13.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to
di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before
fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hart Memorial Trophy
Wally Tatomir - August 4, 2007, authored by User:Maxim.
Stanley Cup (Earlier collaboration, very many involved)
