User talk:Paradoxic
Abdullah ibn Saba
K, feel free to make any radical changes such as the deletion of primary sources (from all sides, can't just be one) and putting in valid secondary sources, like
Project management
Iran election
Does THIS look like the protesting is over? [1] well?--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Warnings
- Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.
- welcome pageto learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Blocked
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Paradoxic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Consensus was reached with Shamwow, the edit was held for a day, until POV was imposed again by WIMYV, calling people who marched at Al-Quds day "Paid agents" of the Islamic Republic, this is a public and international day. WIMYV then went on to delete cited information and news sources, such as Press TV, the only news source covering al-quds day live. He cited a source instead, Al-jazeera, which is banned in Iran and does not report on al-Quds day. Usage of second hand information and outlets that do not operate in Iran to be an authority. Alefbe later on reverted the page to WIMYV's edits. I discussed in talk page and without replying Alefbe went on to further revert the page to the POV state WIMYV left it.
Decline reason:
You were still edit warring, and as you've had some warnings re. not keeping a
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Paradoxic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not edit warring until my cited sources were deleted and reversed by WIMYV. I urged WIMYV to discuss it in talk, and WIMYV argued that the people in the march were paid agents, this is not reasonable of course. In fact, the entire section was deleted and revisions were made that used second hand sources. Currently, the section is a POV mess. It handles only the Iranian political refugee view that is inherently against Iran and the Islamic Republic. "Fewer youth attend Al-Quds day" for example comes from exiled television shows aired in Los Angeles, claiming that the elderly clerics are being overrun by a secular youth that admires America. Although this sounds very cute, the claim itself has no statistical evidence, nor empirical, nor verifiable. In fact, the largest mosque in Tehran had to close an entire street to facilitate worshippers. The onus of proof was on the other user to come up with evidences for their claims, WIMYV in particular, who deleted the cited information and called the millions of people that marched "paid agents of the regime". The article is a POV zoo thanks to him. The page now looks as if it was not a march for palestine, but a typical 'state versus the people' populism wiki. Great moderating.--Paradoxic (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"I was not edit warring until..." In other words, you admit you were edit warring. Block is appropriate. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I've left a proposal at Talk:International al-Quds Day#Suggestion for an editing restriction on the article; please comment if you have a moment. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 22:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)]
Blocked as a sock puppet
|
This account has been allowed , but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text |