User talk:Parminder Sarwara

Hello, Parminder Sarwara, and

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tum Bin, you may be blocked from editing. Tolly4bolly 09:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding INRConvert templates to infoboxes,[1][2][3][4] (etc.) please. Per longstanding consensus at

And don't fabricate data either, as you did here and here, etc. All content needs to be sourced. And no, bestoftheyear.in is not suitable. Stick to mainstream sources, not blogs or other garbage sites. See

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Fabricating content is a very quick way to wind up no longer welcome to edit at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

And this is indistinguishable from vandalism, since the reference says 17 crore, not 21 as you claim. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked not only for continuing to use the INRConvert template in the infobox contrary to community preferences, but also for fabricating financial figures. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ghayal: Once Again appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sam Worthington, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what exactly I did wrong. I had improved the readability of the information on Sam Worthington's page by writing more coherently consistent sentences. I also improved the manner in which the paragraphs were structured. I felt that the information available on the site on Sam Worthington i

is far too limited. The current information does not include the box office success Worthington enjoyed during and post the success of Avatar (2009). It also doesn't haenough ny information on his work from 2013 to 20 1. Moreover, it lacks information of his involvement in Avatar So as a result, 2 had updated the page. I. I think Worthington's page needs to be updated and I request that the changes I made must be reverted back. Please feel free to offer any feedback. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think my internet disconnected as I was writing this reply so there are some mistakes. But I hope you can understand the points I'm making. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parminder Sarwara, I'll try to reply in detail tomorrow. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bro you forgot to respond I think. Either respond to me in 2-3 days or I'm editing Sam Worthington's page. Don't undo my changes if you aren't going to provide me any reasons for why you disagree with my edits. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 09:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Parminder Sarwara. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Bobby Deol where you updated the gross box office receipts for Animal.

Thank you for that update. However, please remember to update the |date= and |access-date= parameters of the citation when you update the value of the gross receipts. I have done that for you here. Thank you. Happy editing.  — Archer (t·c) 14:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayo, thanks man Parminder Sarwara (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Salman Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did add a reliable source at the end from "Box Office India". BOI is the most cited source of commercial success of Indian films on Wikipedia. The source I cited lists entire filmography of Khan from start to finish and their performances. In the future, don't remove content without reading proof reading the source. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is

WP:OR or editorializing). Another editor had already objected to it, so your reinsertion is the fundamental problem...need to discuss and get consensus rather than the appearance of starting an edit-war. DMacks (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright then, let's discuss it. How is that WP:SYNTH? The source I cited literally mentions the words, hit, flop, average etc. Since the article specifically states that information, it's not WP:SYNTH. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are using the raw data to make an analysis. Obviously there were lots of films that had poor financial and/or critical results, and a few that did well. But who are we to say that overall this was the lowest phase? Couldn't one or two successes be considered more important than lots of non-successes? It might or might not be true, but that's why we need a reliable source to draw any conclusion. Obviously there were some good and some bad in the 2000–2010 range. But again, who are we to demarcate this as the range of the "fluctuations" (weren't there already two flops in 1999?). DMacks (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging

Ravensfire, who undid your edit the first time you made it (and I see has similar concerns). DMacks (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:SYNTH. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Buddy you had no problems undoing my edits without discussion, why am I obliged to start a discussion with you if I wanna undo your edits. What goes around comes around. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding uncited analysis is not acceptable. That was explained in the

WP:HOUNDING, and general threats will quickly lead to you being blocked altogether. I can tell by your talkpage you have a history of not behaving collaboratively and in keeping with our behavioral and content standards. DMacks (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You said I need sources to back up the lowest phase claim, so once I find the source, it's logical that I post my edit back on Khan's page with citation. Isn't that what you asked for?

So what do you want me to do now? Find a source and be like "Hey DMack, look I found a source!" They you're going to read the source and give me a thumbs up? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm genuinely asking.

And how can you block me? Are you a rank above me? What is my rank? Parminder Sarwara (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's called

WP:BRD - you Boldly make a change, but when it's Reverted, you need to start the Discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

So the problem you have is with the sentence stating "lowest phase", you could have asked for citation rather than deleting it. I'll find sources about it and repost my edit with the source. Parminder Sarwara (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]