User talk:Paxcoder

[1]

Thanks for pointing this out. Please see my comment on this. Thank you.--torusJKL (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... Why the image is a pointless image man?... is related to free and open sources licences, and the relation to all who interact for make software... really I made a mistake when you add it first ... so I removed that from that place ... Thank you for sending this message ... maybe you can tell me any image related to this, after that I design, and places it in the right place...

V A R G U X write me a comment 05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment again... Well, I drew this picture ... perhaps, as you mention, I should add arrow and some description, with a caption below.

I will create a new version, adding what you mention and some things that are useful and which are related to FOSS.

V A R G U X write me a comment 02:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paxcoder, i dont understand it, on 4 October you add GNU/Linux to the article [[2]] with a comment, and today the reverse, whats up ? also there is no user Paxcoder who joined Talk:GNewSense. So feel free to do so now Mion (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no appologies needed, solved. Cheers Mion (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for not removing the quote Paxcoder. I understand all that stuff about importance when adding citations, but to be honest, what is more important than Ignatius' quotes about Jesus? I mean, people who go to St. Ignatius' page are almost certainly going because of their curiosity of his relation to Jesus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glorthac (talk • contribs) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You suggested removal in 2008: I second that, having added some chapter and verse on why on the discussion page, as this is a gross breach of NPOV written by a Catholic adorative. Please contact me on jelmain skynet be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.142.15 (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested a removal of the reference of it being confirmed only. As I can see, this has since been provided sources for. --Paxcoder (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have been reported on

Hello, Paxcoder. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]