User talk:Perpetualization
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Perpetualization, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 11:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Errors that you are introducing in the article on Lewis Libby
Please see
Image:2008_GOP_Iowa.png
Hi, Perpetualization. I'm happy to see you contributing to the charts in the polling section. I have one minor suggestion for improvement: I think, for each poll, the data should add up to 100% so as to not under-represent the number of undecided voters and voters currently favoring "other" candidates. In my charts summarizing poll data for GOP candidates, I've tracked the four major Republicans, and I see you've added Huckabee, which is great (particularly in Iowa), but I think the Undecided category could be improved by including "Other" candidates and calling the combined category "Undecided/Other" or by adding an "Other" category so that each poll adds up to 100%. Keep up the great work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robapalooza (talk • contribs) 18:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2a/2008_GOP_Iowa_6_Months.png/600px-2008_GOP_Iowa_6_Months.png)
Hi,
I noticed that you were upset that I uploaded a different version of this picture. Might I suggest that you change the way your format the graph to make it more informative? I think that using a moving average rather than a linear regression best represents the information you intend to convey. For example, in this picture specifically, Fred Thompson's polling numbers rise significantly just after he announces his candidacy officially, then fall in the subsequent months. A linear regression does not show this trend well; a moving average does. Let me know what you think.
Cheers,
Acegikmo1 (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Perpetualization,
- What you say makes a lot of sense. Leaving the previous six months graphs as they are but changing the graphs convering more time is probably the best way to convey the information. If you intend to do this, you have my support and appreciation. Let me know.
- Sincerely,
Chart software?
Regarding the charts in
WP:NOT reply
I explained my reasoning for reverting that part of
Here are some examples of how the information within the articles may be confusing, misleading or without sufficient context (although I do neccessary think that these are the reasons for deletion)
- There is no indication of the sample size for each poll
- There is no indication of the data collection techniques for each poll
- There is no indication of who was included in the sample and how or why they were chosen
- There is no indication of the margin of error for each poll
- There is no indication of the purpose of each poll
- There is no indication of all the options available as responses to each poll
- There is no indication of he question(s) posed by each poll
- There is no critical analysis of the sampling techniques, questions, etc. for each poll
- There is no indication of the ongoing political events at the time of each poll
- There is no information on the organisations carrying out each poll and whatever bias they may or may not have
Wikipedia is not a list of
]- I would be happy for you to use any of the points I made to try and improve any aspect of Wikipedia. Regards, [[Guest9999 (talk) 02:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)]]
Graphic Designer's Barnstar
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
![]() |
Orson Scott Card Views on sex
Just to let you know I'm proposing restoring this section - see my reasoning and proposed wording for the section on the talk page. Look forward to hearing your thoughts. --Zeborah (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
"Minor edits" and edit summary comments
Please read up on these two subjects before you do any more editing. See
Cookie
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/Choco_chip_cookie.jpg/100px-Choco_chip_cookie.jpg)
Its the Cookie Monster (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Sourcing on Elizabeth Warren
Please review our
]Final warning
- I fail to understand the reasons for this warning and feel that it was given incorrectly or in error. I do not meet the qualifications for it as described on the template page. I have posted on Bearian's talk page. Perpetualization (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Accusing an attorney of being ]
- That is an utterly false statement and this is quite frankly an abuse of your moderator powers. I did not accuse an attorney of being disbarred. Elizabeth Warren stated that she is not a registered member of the New York bar. I introduced a section in an article describing a recent controversy where there was some discussion about whether or not her practice of law was illegal given the fact that she was not a member of the bar. Disbarment was never an issue as all parties to the controversy agreed on her membership status. Additionally, I have not been warned before. Perpetualization (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- You got so many of your facts wrong, that I can't begin to respond. I am sorry you feel that way. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Can you take the time to actually respond to what I'm saying, as is required of you as a sysop? I never made a statement of disbarment. You have falsely claimed that I made such a statement. Perpetualization (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- You got so many of your facts wrong, that I can't begin to respond. I am sorry you feel that way. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- That is an utterly false statement and this is quite frankly an abuse of your moderator powers. I did not accuse an attorney of being disbarred. Elizabeth Warren stated that she is not a registered member of the New York bar. I introduced a section in an article describing a recent controversy where there was some discussion about whether or not her practice of law was illegal given the fact that she was not a member of the bar. Disbarment was never an issue as all parties to the controversy agreed on her membership status. Additionally, I have not been warned before. Perpetualization (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I admit that I over-reacted to this edit, and will change that to a 1st warning, but I emphasize that you made a ]
- Accusing an attorney of being ]
Thank you for experimenting with the page
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Men's Rights". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 15:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
Please do not blank pages, as you did to
Linking section headings
Regarding this edit, per
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Insert-signature.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Button_sig.png)
A friendly noyice
Thank you for
Goodbye
Your last message on my user page contained nothing I wish to pursue, so I deleted the discussion. For example, you referred to my edits as "accidental vandalism", which is an oxymoron.
(You may delete this also...)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Gamergate discretionary sanctions notice
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised
--Aquillion (talk) 08:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Perpetualization. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)