User talk:Pevarnj

Your recent edit to

Be careful about reverting vandalism as you did on this edit: [1]. You reverted back to vandalism that I reverted.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 23:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't 'vandalise' the pages for deletion page; I can't create articles. I can list them (you've got to agree this should be deleted) and last time I put something there I got a helping hand by someone who created it for me. Sorry if it looked like vandalism, but that wasn't my intent. --69.145.122.209 02:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, I get that a lot. I guess I should register eventually... Being an anon IP creates problems, and I was in a hurry. My edit was hasty anyway, so don't think anything of it; --69.145.122.209 02:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :) --69.145.122.209 02:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that this reduces the vandalism of articles. I added a note on top of my "Vandal Bait" page. Hopefully, vandals vandalise that page instead of Wikipedia's articles.

subst:smile2

}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 10:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey dude,the tomato thing...that is my whole school's ip. Please don't warn my entire school due to the conduct of a few bad students...I hope u understand...thx u —The preceding

Hi there. You took User_talk:70.72.5.126 off the blocking vandals page, I think they should be blocked for good. They've already been blocked twice, and have vandalized 3 times since then, on the 17th and today even after repeated warnings. Is there some way to do this? Thanks, --Awiseman 22:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism --Awiseman 15:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please explain here why you suspect CoolJ might be a puppet of Prin? Anwar 01:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert. Tis much appreciated. --You Know Who ^{(Dark Mark)} 23:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pevarnj! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

Why did you reverted my edit? I answer their questions. (69.117.20.128 - talk)

By deleting the questions. Answering questions is one thing, deleting information is another. --pevarnj ^(t/c/@) 03:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Pevarnj. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pevarnj. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]