User talk:PhileasFoggTheFourth

The article Elena K. Lincoln has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

GoogleBooks and GoogleScholar searches produce little of relevance; does not appear to pass

WP:PROF

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the concern that the Elena K. Lincoln page may not coincide with Wikipeida's policies on notability. However, after I read her works, I found it very interesting to examine her theories on the social structure in Mayan society. She proposed that marriages could practically be predicted between kin groups in Mayan society, even up to the 17th century. This is very interesting, because it seems to draw off some of the former work of people including Sylvanus Morley and Gordon Willey, who I understand she studied under in the 1980s whilst working in Yucatan, and while changing some of their theories by proposing her own, modern studies such as those from Latin American Antiquity journal and journals emanating from the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard. PhileasFoggTheFourth talk) 3:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena K. Lincoln is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena K. Lincoln until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nsk92 (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Edward Lincoln is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Edward Lincoln until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Weazie (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward Barna Kurjack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Classes, Western, Mayan, Settlement and Hillsborough High School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]