User talk:Pillow da Don

]

Promotional? I do not even know the individual nor do I live in his home state. The sources I used were all mainstream, non-local websites and news coverages. Nor did it contain any links for anyone to "purchase" or "buy" anything.I will re-add this edit later with cite web templates, I will omit the mention of him being a YouTuber if thats where the concern lies.

Christopher Bores. Pillow da Don (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A section such as "Notable paranormal investigators" should be written with some balance. It's currently only covering Harry Price and Ed and Lorraine Warren, the three most famous investigators of the 20th century. It shouldn't devote a third subsection to YouTuber who does live shows for a venue in Ohio, implying that he is the only significant paranormal investigator of the last twenty years. Please do not add Chris Bores back to the article. Belbury (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

are some guideposts to improve the draft.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 11:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Legend discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Damita Jo and Back to Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As reliable sources mainly refer to him as Russ, and he only uses it professionally it needs to be made clear that this is his better known name. For example the Elvis Presley article gives his full name followed by better known monomously as Elvis, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi hi. Chris Brown wrote that record. Check its official credits. I don't know why you're continuously removing it (without even giving an explaination for it). An explanation from you is needed.

]

Well if you're talking about the song "Worth It" by Young Thug, it was not included due to that song instead interpolating "Autumn Leaves" by Chris Brown instead, hence why the songs co-writers, Kendrick Lamar and B.A.M. are credited on the "Worth It".^[1] According to the guideline that's been established for the section, it needs to be songs Breezy (or whichever artist) had direct credit of involvement with. That's why it says "(excluding guest appearances, interpolations, and samples)." Pillow da Don (talk) 01:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CeeLo Green discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrodisiac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August Alsina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Do You Mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeezy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lose My Mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

]

This birth date was from Wikidata. If you’ll delete it, you may as well delete it on there too. Pillow da Don (talk) 15:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Future (rapper), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ihateneo (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take some brain power to think about your edit. All I did here was capitalized a term for which the subject was already capitalized. Pillow da Don (talk) 04:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2 Chainz, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your latest edit seemed fine though. ihateneo (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French Montana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shot Caller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pillow. There's recent discussion for track listing template. If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2910:B6D2:17AD:92A:C97:B78A (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T.I., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kill the King.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ja Rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livin' It Up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pillow da Don. Thank you for your work on

, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which you are doing here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mase&action=history as the IP 144.129.234.114 is discouraged, see

]

Thank you for your comment. However, unfortunately, I have noticed you have been reverting some decent, sourced edits across the site without explanation. One such time, undid your own revert because the edit I made was constructive and improved the article. If you continue to do this, try to supply an edit summary so editors can know what to improve on with the version of which you undid. Understand that we (except for a minute few) are all trying to build a better site here, and the edits of mine and others take extended amounts of time and research. While I concur that guidelines need to be met, please don’t make your time as a Wikipedian dismissive of this and needlessly militant, or worse yet, stressful, for yourself and others.

—P.S. If the rationale for doing so in that information is unsourced, take closer looks at the references provided (even if it’s an article that you’re not personally interested in) Pillow da Don (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]