User talk:Pingpong123q

Hello, Pingpong123q, and

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mkdw^talk 22:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

]

March 2013

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as

]

Pingpong123q, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Pingpong123q! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 01:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

A tag has been placed on

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your edits, but please do not add in names to the above or any other disambiguation lists unless there are existing articles for the people you are adding. The inclusion of non-existing entries in disambiguation lists goes against Wikipedia's

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Birchard Austin Hayez, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rbhayes.org/hayes/mssfind/274/hayesbirch2.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Altervista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Banzai

Baldini & Castoldi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Einaudi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lorenzo Sebastiani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Sebastiani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw^talk 23:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo, you may be blocked from editing. Mkdw^talk 23:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are trying to contribute to Wikipedia but have not read through some of the basic principals and rules of the website. If you require help, please ask at the

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mkdw^talk 23:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Casini, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mkdw^talk 23:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  v/r - TP 00:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldini & Castoldi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldini & Castoldi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw^talk 00:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]