User talk:Planetdust
Welcome
|
Nomination of Macro Recordings for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macro Recordings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Villa Kamogawa
The article
Stub for non-notable artist residency
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acousmana (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Villa Kamogawa for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa Kamogawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Acousmana (talk) 11:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Sweet. I see the headline "All three major German artist residencies, some of which have been around since 1910, wiped off of Wikipedia" coming to a German broadsheet soon.Planetdust (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Blocking and hounding
Hi El_C. Better here.. The only reason I ever mentioned JK over there is because another editor introduced him, without connection to the discussion, using the name of a deceased editor as leverage for his week-long personal attack on me. He did the same previously and has spread this bit and much worse over different discussions, some over AfD which he nominated himself. I have no intention insulting anybody's memories and have not edited anything regarding JK (although I was less than happy with the exchange I had with him). However, I feel everybody must be able to express views, point to double standards and distortions without being attacked personally. It's not normal that anything I say is labelled with some derogative term, even if it has a WP: in front. That you join what I believe can by now be described as hounding doesn't seem appropriate to me. I particularly think threats of immediate blocking are not warrantable, given the context. Thanks for your consideration. Planetdust (talk) 14:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Planetdust, you are not only facing imminent sanctions for that egregious misconduct ("troll"), but also for just badgering and WP:HOUND —which are totally without basis, with obviously no shred of proof— is also cause for sanctions. You can take this as a final warning. El_C 15:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)]
- WP:BLUDGEONing? How come I'm "facing imminent sanctions" while that user is free to attack everything I say on personal grounds and without evidence? Planetdust (talk) 15:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)]
- Planetdust, one separate discussion and two related ones do not HOUNDING make. Maybe just give discussions a chance to evolve without the constant badgering replies....? And maybe stop assuming bad faith, while you're at it...? El_C 15:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion Review, and that was your choice, you don't have a reason to complain when they respond. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)]
- And if you do report the so-called hounding at battleground editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)]
- WP:HOUNDdescribes perfectly what I'm experiencing: focused, selective treatment aimed at disrupting + discrediting anything I say or present – regularly inserted into conversations with others who explicitly invited me to provide specified info. Now that one editor has become the inevitable echo to my signature, not the other way around, should make you reconsider who's shutting down whom.
- I don't mind a week (or decade) off if the actions of others in the same environment receive the same level of examination and threat of sanction. I'm sure if you think about it, you did not mean what you wrote: a threat of unrelated sanction if I submit something for others to evaluate under a process explicitly provided by Wikipedia (funny though, since I haven't uttered any such threats, just as I'm not proposing deletion of anyone's efforts). If WP:PG apply only to me but not to others, I think I've seen enough of this collaborative environment. – Btw. if you check the actual discussion at [4] you might like to revise your characterisation of me as "hostile". Thanks. Planetdust (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)]
- Planetdust, one separate discussion and two related ones do not HOUNDING make. Maybe just give discussions a chance to evolve without the constant badgering replies....? And maybe stop assuming bad faith, while you're at it...? El_C 15:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review