You removed the Croatian description attributed to:
{{cite book}}
|isbn=
from Francesco Laurana:
Per
Retired
Wikipedia is not accurate or reliable.
At first glance, Wikipedia appears above board. Its clever name is a play on the word encyclopedia, implying an unimpeachable and unbiased compilation of information. But like other salacious websites, Wikipedia is a haphazard collection of opinions subjectively presented as fact. It uses mostly unidentified people to submit ideas on any topic of their choosing, and rather than utilize professional fact checking, Wikipedia posts information and relies on corroboration from other random Internet posters.
Source : I
I have a degree with honors from the Bocconi University in Milan and a Master of Science in Development Management, awarded with Distinction by LSE.
Laurana ? Leading historians agree Francesco Laurana was primarily Italian.
The Academic American Encyclopedia, The Grove Art Online, Encyclopædia Britannica (Editions: 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012), The Oxford Dictionary of Art, The Oxford companion to art, The Renaissance of Roman Architecture, and Enciclopedia Italiana identify Laurana as an "Italian sculptor and medallist".
And...
Britannica Encyclopedia (2002) writes that Laurana was " an Italian (Croatian-born) sculptor and medalist."
The modern Croatian historiography is still suffering from prejudices that have their roots in national conflicts of the 19th century. Croatian sources are not reliable. --PoseidonAndMedusa (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current