User talk:Pragya at Nostra Gaming

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pragya at Nostra Gaming (talk) 03:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pragya at Nostra Gaming (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject: Request for Unblock – Account:Pragya at Nostra Gaming

Dear Jimfbleak,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address the recent indefinite block imposed on my Wikipedia account. I appreciate your commitment to maintaining the quality and neutrality of Wikipedia content.

Upon reviewing the situation, I realize that my previous edits inadvertently violated Wikipedia's guidelines by including promotional material. I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused and assure you that I have taken corrective measures.

Specific Actions Taken

1. I have rewritten the content related to my company's Wikipedia page.

2. All promotional or advertising elements have been removed.

3. The revised content now adheres strictly to Wikipedia's policies.

I kindly request that you reconsider the block based on these changes. I am committed to contributing constructively and abiding by Wikipedia's standards moving forward.

Please find the revised content attached below for your reference:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fU1Qaalw3rrSNCXVRh9RkVNjbeQ50QFDCVzTsZ1BAes/edit?usp=sharing

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Pragya at Nostra Gaming Pragya at Nostra Gaming (talk) 06:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak Pragya at Nostra Gaming (talk) 03:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks for ping. The procedure for requesting an unblock is in the box above. If you do as it says, a different admin will review your request. It's unlikely that you will be unblocked just to write about your company, but the draft you linked is completely non-compliant anyway. For the sake of completeness, you should read the following general guidance.

You have an obvious

conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Pragya at Nostra Gaming. The template {{Paid

}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pragya at Nostra Gaming|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide
independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines
. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources
.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits

You must write in a
non-promotional
tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here
; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]