User talk:Qed

Hi. At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 16, you asked "Is there an official Wikipedia definition of 'notability' that I need to look up?". Yes, there is. The basic rules are at Wikipedia:Notability, which has links to pages with rules for specific types of articles. The rules for Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) probably apply to the YouTube atheists. I hope this helps. CWC(talk) 02:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page

Now that I look back, it's just that the links could have been organized (in a "References" or "Notes" section (as seen in bigger articles)). Sorry for any inconvenience. BTW: remember to sign your posts on talk pages.Cavenba 03:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please be very careful about calling another editor a "vandal". That word has a specific meaning at Wikipedia. Because we get so much vandalism and it's so freaking annoying, "vandal" is a very negative word here. As the Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy says, try to "comment on content, not on the contributor". That's not just the law, it's a really good idea. Cheers, CWC(talk) 07:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Qed. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just

You didn't mean "light years", you meant "years" in this edit.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QED, you're quite welcome to start commenting on long-dead discussions on talk pages, but please don't start changing other people's contributions as you did here. There may be typos in their contributions but that's their responsibility. Even changing the spacing of paragraphs makes it quite difficult for others to follow what you've done or not done and they may make mistakes. Thanks, Chris55 (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your doubts on the page are spot on. It received full /r/badhistory treatment, as it happened to one of its main sources . --80.181.77.135 (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I further answered --82.61.189.135 (talk) 17:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Qed. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Qed. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qed. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qed. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	A yummy kebab
	This is for your great efforts on Wikipedia. Keep it up! V. E. (talk) 17:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]