User talk:RA0808/Archives2011/July

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there. This edit to

Looking at the full diff of my reversion it is a good faith edit, but still unconstructive as he/she was promoting the business in their username.

I agree that a level 4 warning was uncalled for and I take full responsibility. I should have double checked the warning history while using Huggle, so that was careless on my part (I know "use of an automatic tool" is not an excuse, so I take responsibility). Thanks for drawing my attention to this, I'll go and change the warning to a level 1. Regards, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 12:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree the username is problematic (hence the coi-username warning), but that doesn't make the users contributions "unconstructive". I do, however, conceed that it should probably have been reworded / removed!

stoned

12:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I have gone and replaced my level 4 warning with a level 1 advert warning, and added a message explaining my rationale. Again, thanks for pointing this out. I'll do my best to be more careful in the future! RA0808 ^talk_contribs 12:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

No worries :)

stoned

13:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For the quick attack revert on T|C|E-Mail 13:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! :D RA0808 ^talk_contribs 13:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know I have challenged your

Thanks for the heads up, it looks like the administrators have already dealt with him/her. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 21:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)