User talk:Raritydash

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

I just wanted to remind you that

@Philipnelson99: Thanks for the fact about the sock puppetry. Actually, that user is actually User:Smallmouthbassboost, the master account, who then create more accounts to vandalize Taylor Swift related articles. It's really driving me crazy and I felt really annoyed by that behavior. I actually used someone's method for that warning when someone is evading a block. Once again, thanks for your suggestion and I will try to keep that in mind. Raritydash (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not know if you would be interested, however, in knowing your experience in editing music-related articles, thought you would like to participate in the discussion here. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, sorry for the late response but I will say it on my talk page as I do not want to get involve with this argument. I do agree that just because the song is included on the album doesn't mean it is a single unless the artist say so and looking at your edits on what are you doing, it does seem to be a valid response and the IP doesn't seem to corporate well. Raritydash (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; it's a case of

personal attacks were made, and I refuse to be involved in that. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure no problem. And you know, I was in this situation too last year like in The Champion (song), I removed "Cry Pretty" as it is not a single for this album like this and then a month later an IP revert me but then revert him/herself. So I'm pretty sure that there is an article that would say that not to add the song that is included on the album unless it is a single confirmed by artist. Raritydash (talk) 00:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe there are plenty of them, however, I do not see that making an impact unless multiple editors chime in. Right now, it is a one vs one argument (and the second person is clearly only siding on personal accord). livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show this difference objectively using a source? There are a lot of songs which have multiple projects in their infobox, including Better (Khalid song), More (Usher song) and God's Plan (song). Just to name a few. What makes these songs different than "Meant To Be"? Can you show that difference with proof? Not saying you're wrong. Just very curious. Nikki Lee 1999 (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles as it explains why we do not add the song that is included on the album unless if the artist confirms that it is a single for the album, then we can add it. As of right now, we need to stick to the policy which I linked. Raritydash (talk) 01:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you semi protect the Curious George (franchise) page? MLJ 657 (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this up to

WP:RPP. Only an administrator will do that. I won't be able to do that since I'm not an administrator. Sorry. Raritydash (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @Raritydash. There's recent discussion for track listing template. If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2910:B6D2:17AD:92A:C97:B78A (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]