User talk:Rast5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Rast5, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV)
. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the

helpme
}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

BWilkins ←track) 16:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of

welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DPetryz (talkcontribs
) 17:02, 21 December 2011‎

Calling "sock"

If you're genuinely concerned about sockpuppet behaviour, please

McGeddon (talk) 19:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Filled. You're working in Wikipedia enough time to not ask me such questions but to see (feel) the obvious. Do you see any differences between Biographyspot's and DPetryz's edits? Rast5 (talk) 20:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been
page protection. Swarm X 22:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

False citations

Please be warned not to use false citations, as you did on Tamara Toumanova, to push your point of view. The citations have to explicitly state whatever you are trying to prove, and they cannot merely be lists of something, like ancestry.com list that you like to provide. Please also note that primary sources - i.e. Tamara Toumanova saying something herself - will have to carry more weight than links to some questionable authors and even people who may have known her.--Andriabenia (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Read the sources presented and stop pushing your nationalist POV. Toumanova was of Polish-Armenian decent, even if you dislike it. Rast5 (talk) 19:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision
section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at

, and with the case decision page.

Please also note that calling other editors "nationalists" can be considered a violation of
BWilkins ←track) 16:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
You have been
BWilkins ←track) 11:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

3rr

Your recent editing history at

block
.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's

edit warring
even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.


You have been
page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Additionally, per
WP:ARBAA2, please consider this an indefinite 1RR restriction on all Armenia-Azerbaijan topics, broadly construed. Any further edit warring problems will likely result in longer, if not indefinite blocks of this account. If you are confused about our edit warring policies, or about the new restrictions on your editing, now is a good time to ask. Kuru (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]