User talk:Raturous

April 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shakshouka. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also suggest you read the previous discussions on the article's talk page (This one might be of interest to you). M.Bitton (talk) 23:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the talk page thread for clarification. Thank you. Raturous (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

furthermore, after Bitton clarified what edit war was I stopped. I only reverted once, whereas he reverted multiple times. On top of that he wants to remove a chunk of the history where it says it's origins are disputed and could be from Egypt. I asked him to provide a source as for the reason why he wants it removed and he wouldn't although I provided a source as to regards of the Egyptian roots of the dish as it is has been part of the cuisine for a long time. I wanted the start to clarify that it's north African, as Maghrebi implies it doesn't include Egypt. Raturous (talk) 20:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here's even more sources, and I find this "debate" quite silly and as I said it's already mentioned in the history part of the article. No self-respecting North African would dispute this:

5 Raturous (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]