User talk:Rdunn

I don't think my comment was uncivil--the talk page is long, and basically unreadable. However, I do think that editing other people's talk page comments isn't a good idea. Please refrain from it in the future--if you have a problem with a comment someone's made, why not contact them before editing it out? --Akhilleus (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it was not the best thing for you to write when everyone is so heated.  rdunnalbatross  14:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps that's true, but editing other people's talk page comments is usually not a way to make things calmer either. --Akhilleus (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise then. the rules about editing talk comments conflict with the civil rules so I felt it best so that the talk page doesnt desend into a slanging match.  rdunnalbatross  14:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the report. Vandalism, however, is not reported at UAA (which deals with promotional, disruptive, offensive, and misleading usernames. Would you mind moving the report over to AIV?

• Superblackjack (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) reason: vandalism only account  rdunnalbatross  07:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has vandalized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:24, 12

October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, ceranthor 12:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

woops.  rdunnalbatross  12:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was a fail? Heh, =) ceranthor 13:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've added the flag for you. Please review

For moving that post from my userpage to my talk page. It's appreciated. :) --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 13:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

moved from user:ikip

==

Article Rescue Squadron

newsletter on User talk Bb515200000001‎ ==

you placed a copy of the ARS newsletter on User talk:Bb515200000001‎. I ould like to point out that he was indef blocked in march.  rdunnalbatross  12:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out the delivery of the newsletter to the wrong editor. I strived so hard after the delivery of the last newsletter to make sure that these mistakes did not happen again, but I guess editor names change, people leave, and people get banned.

Thank you for your wonderful dilegence in catching this mistake. I am updating the list of editors now. Ikip

The Wikipedia:Trading card game project needs your help in choosing the rules, which is essential for developing everything else of the game. Please consider !voting for a set of rules here. You may voice your opinion about a particular set here. Also, if you have a new idea on what the rules could be, you are encouraged to propose a new set of rules (instructions can be found at the !voting page). Thank you, ♠TomasBat 02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are receiving this message because you signed your name at the project's list of members.

We're wrapping up the democratic rules approval process. Please see

If you are no longer interested in helping out with the project, please remove your name from the participants list.

Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]