User talk:ResultingConstant
Specifics
Hi, which of the bullet points from
]- @Distelfinck: The first one. Anything he has to say in that interview could be put into text in the article and just cite the interview. ResultingConstant (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- A 16 minute interview should be quoted in full in the article? Also, there's information like body language, facial expressions, that are better confered when viewed directly --Distelfinck (talk) 14:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks. Iāve decided to underscore complex nature of laws by adding a brief section on ambiguity of category to the article, with Utah as example.
Jessegalebaker (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Shortšdescriptions
Hi! Thank you for co-editing an article with me. You mentioned that you wanted to make one short description more accurate. However, the aim is to be concise, most of all. Tune in: https://wikipedia.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Short_description The sentence āAccusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United Statesā into which you reverted the short description to is 90 characters long, more than double the recommended maximum count. Moreover, it repeats words already in the title, e.g. Bill Clinton, when it is advisable to use words that are informative rather than repetitive in it. https://wikipedia.com/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_assault_and_misconduct_allegations ToniTurunen (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ToniTurunen: I'm ok with something shorter, but to exclude the fact that the allegations were sexual in nature is whitewashing. ResultingConstant (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's not - sexuality is already mentioned in the title. š ToniTurunen (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review