User talk:Rniterjr

Hello Rniterjr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Robert Niter for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 02:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kavdiamanju,

Thanks for the notice. I am currently in editing phase and published to quickly. Thank you!

RniterjrRniterjr (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Zackmann08 Thank you for the update. I will make the necessary adjustments to the infobox as requested. Thanks again! Rniterjr (talk) 02:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Zackmann08 Thanks for making the update. In the future, I will not use thumbnails in the infobox. I have referenced the template page in addition. Thanks!Rniterjr (talk) 03:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Niter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Niter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Niter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Niter (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marvellous Spider-Man 01:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Black Kite (talk) Thank you for the notification. The article for Robert Niter has been deleted. Could you please explain the reason behind deleting the article? Thank you.Rniterjr (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very simply because the rationales of the "Delete" votes were more convincing than the "Keep" ones, and the more pressing issue that most of the "Keep" votes (including your two votes) appeared to come from the same or a linked source and were thus discounted. Black Kite (talk) 23:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]