User talk:Robert Kowalski
Welcome!
Hello, Robert Kowalski, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Dear Ruud, Is this what you meant by placing helpme on my talk page? In any case, I would like your advice about the page negation as failure. As you might know, I edited the section on NAF in logic programming with a link to the NAF page. But the NAF page is a mess. It needs to be deleted and replaced by a new entry. What do you think? And, more importantly, what is the best way to go about it? Robert Kowalski 12:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've added an {{be bold when you do so, even rewriting it fully if you want. --h2g2bob 13:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)]
- Pages are usually only deleted when the subject not suited for inclusion in an encyclopaedia. When the subject is worthy of inclusion but the current article is incorrect/badly written/etc., it is generally a good idea to place a {{Ruud 20:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)]
Hi Bob, Welcome to the Wikipedia! More experts certainly are needed and should be very welcome. However, you should be aware that some in the community have disdained the contributions of experts and consequently there are some pitfalls to watch out for. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.--Carl Hewitt 01:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
You should be aware that Ruud Koot reverted changes to the article on
History of logic programming
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Nuvola_apps_important_yellow.svg/48px-Nuvola_apps_important_yellow.svg.png)
A
Unreferenced BLPs
- Jack Minker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Jim portrait like photo.png
You uploaded or restored , File:Jim portrait like photo.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.
If it's entirely your own work, please include {{|claimed=yes
and an |author=
to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information
If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{
Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Computer program contributions
Thank you for your contributions to Computer_program#Prolog. They are profound. Timhowardriley (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Horn clause
You've reverted my edit and the page is back on the error list. The author name in the sfn template and the citation must match, including capitalization. I don't know whether you prefer "van" or "Van" but please make them consistent. Thanks. Andy02124 (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I implemented a work-around to allow "Van" in the citation and "van" in the footnote, as I can see your concern. Sorry if I sounded a bit harsh. Andy02124 (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maarten van Emden and I agreed to put our names on the paper in alphabetical order, "E" before "K". Maarten explained to me that "van" doesn't count and should be written in lower case. Google scholar cites the paper as "Van Emden and Kowalski". But the official publication https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/321978.321991
- names Maarten as "M H van Emden" at the bottom of the first page. Sorry, if my concern seems a bit pedantic. Robert Kowalski (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)