User talk:RoyalCream

Hello, RoyalCream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Egyptair did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Farouk reigned from 1936 to 1952. The Egyptian state nationalized the company in 1949. If you add incorrect information I will remove it. I will also add back the information with sources. Have a good day friend. RoyalCream (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Eli Cohen. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are vandalizing Wikipedia. You will be blocked from editing if you don’t stop. I’m adding correct and not unbiased information. RoyalCream (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jake Wartenberg (talk) 13:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egyptair. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing if you remove my content from

EgyptAir because you are removing correct information. RoyalCream (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Egyptian–Ottoman War (1839–1841), you may be blocked from editing. Please note that since you have already been blocked once, a second block is likely to be longer or potentially indefinite, so please take this and previous warnings seriously. R Prazeres (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Egyptair, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nectanebo II. Lone-078 (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because you are continuing to add unsourced content despite being warned against it, I've blocked you for 72 hours. If you persist on making unsourced edits after this block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 19:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mamluk Sultanate. R Prazeres (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 17:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  v/r - TP 17:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RoyalCream. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply

]