User talk:Ryulong/Archive 70

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Should I add in the Great Power of the Kamen Rider OOO Ranger Keys confirmed by Hyper Hobby April 2012 and Figure-Oh No. 169, or should I wait until the movie like usual. A new Astro Switch (Drill Switch Super-Three) and three cards (Reflecloud? and etc.) for the Goseigers were also confirmed in the magazine as well, however their names are not mentioned unlike the OOO stuff. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 01:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Wait for the movie.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Ryulong I think I was, and I know I was, judging from other editor's comments, too over the top with the AfD. I felt that I wasn't exactly getting through to people when I was putting my two cents in - and that may/may not have been the case with you, but I think I could have taken a different approach to this. I should take this as something to learn from. Apologies for my actions, as they would be deemed as childish.

Hope to work with you sometime on the project - on perhaps something we'll both agree on. Regards, --

These inclusionist/deletionist wars have already been fought over 1000 million times. The authors are not SP or vanity, but heavily literary critiqued authors who sold millions of copies. I wish I could be more patient in this message to you, but the authorial criterion for works have been hammered out in 2005 for chrissakes and we cna't fight these battles over and over and over again. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

The articles are not sourced, and do not seem to say anything about the notability of the work itself. I do not see that these pass

WP:GNG

, even if the author is notable.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Also, they do not appear to pass

WP:BK

.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello! There was a WP BEFORE sourcing. Sourcing is NOVEL--- lack of sourcing requires a tag not a deletion review. Christ, I would have more patience but you newbies editors who weren't around when the site was fought over (the inclusionist/deletionist criteria were hammered out) turn contributing to this project a nightmare. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I've been on Wikipedia for 6 years and I was an admin for nearly half of that. Don't tell me what I can and cannot do.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

And sourcing is what the Wikipedia of the now requires. Don't blame me for the fact you can't keep up with the times.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I will study your contributions next week when I have more time, but what I have seen so far is 1000s of Ultraman and other fanboy plastic figurine collector expertise; at least have the courtesy to allow literary specialists their own unmolested section of interest. We don't go around deleting 'HATSUNE MIKU' vocaloid articles b/c we realize your subculture loves that stuff; give the old classicists their own five or six articles without jumping all over them at maximum velocity 'without the courtesy of an edit history review.' Christ. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Have fun going through my 157,684 edits, then. I frankly don't give a fuck about your edit history or the edit history of any of these pages that you've made. Many have never grown past your initial one to three unsourced paragraphs. Maybe if you didn't write shit articles, I wouldn't be proposing they be deleted. And my preferred topic areas should not be of any matter in this discussion. The fact is, you cannot write an article in line with the current rules and regulations of the project, which at least should be limited to adding god damn categories to the pages so they can be properly indexed.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Ryulong, friend, you've previously been criticized for being too inclusionist. Today, I'm criticizing you for being too deletionist. A novel by

Is he a historic writer such that all his works are important?—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes; read our article about him. I concede that WikiSkeptic should have included more information, but "it is a novel by Ryu Murakami" is an assertion of notability. DS (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I am not too sure.—Ryulong (竜龙) 17:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

At

There have been many instances of the vandal showing up on pages with different IPs, all geolocating to Hong Kong, but I do not know where to find them at this time. He's a pain in the ass and needs to be blocked.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you User:Ryulong for contributing to my user page. I did realize you got rid of my categories on the bottom of my page. Those where things I contributed to and have interest in... I do thank you for the contribution, but would rather have my categories left alone. (RuMoR0922 (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC))

Those items do not belong on your user talk page. Those are categories for articles.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I checked on some website (Japanese) and another few find this;

"最終話 燃え上がれタギル！　栄光のデジモンハント！" on Last Episode 79 - http://anime.webnt.jp/programs/view/64 - Digimon Xros Wars Hunters. I think it's confirmed go to ending on March 25. Thank, Attawafn143 02:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

We'll find out then if it is truly over.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. There's a new disruptive editing on