User talk:Ryulong/Archive 88

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I actually see the page in The Amazing Race Canada that it has actually 10 legs of the Race, an IP editor (184.144.5x.xxx) from Canada had edited that the leg in Nova Scotia is actually one leg, the Newfoundland and Labrador leg is actually leg 9 [1], but legs 8 and 9 are separate legs not double legs. So could you revert it back? ApprenticeFan ^work 00:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Why can't you do it yourself?—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I've fully protected this article for three days. In that time, work out this dispute. You know better. KrakatoaKatie 04:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh, good grief - blew that one. There's a huge backlog at RFPP and the time differences are getting to me. I think it's right to keep the article locked for 72 hours, though, so the differences can be worked out. Let us know if things are settled before then. Sorry for the righteous indignation. KrakatoaKatie 05:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Just as a matter of courtesy, I brought up[2] one of User:ChrisGualtieri's interactions with you[3] in an ANI thread he created. I don't think there's any need for you to get involved in the current matter, but I figure it's better to tell you about it. --erachima talk 18:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Death Note question". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 17:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Given the nature of the dispute and how protracted it has been, plus Kim's disappearance, I believe formal mediation is necessary to resolve the issue. If you agree to formal mediation, than I will ask for an exception to Lucia Black's topic ban in order to have the parties be unfettered in its discussion. I doubt waiting another two months, will resolve the situation and it is in everyone's best interest to have it done formally. Will you agree to mediation on this matter? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't see what good it will do beyond that but fine.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, and glad to hear that you're interested in Chris's mediation suggestion. Could you leave a note on the mediation page if you are willing to take part? If you have any questions, or any reservations about the process, it would also be useful if you could list them there. Or if you want to ask me a question privately, feel free to drop me an email. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

I hope the topic is not controversial enough to attract any more vandals and socks right now. Article seldom edited this year. Lower down to PC? --George Ho (talk) 07:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

What are you asking me and why?—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

According to one of redirects' logs, you enabled semi-protection. Since then, there have been a bunch of renames. If unprotecting it is too soon, what about "pending changes" then? --George Ho (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I have not been an administrator for 4 years. I cannot do anything about the article.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey Ryulong-- I've been working fairly hard on the article for Taiko, and I wanted to ask if you might be interested in doing a GA review of it, as I've nominated it as such. Though I'm not sure of how involved you are in GA reviews, I ask only because you have a strong background in Japanese topics. If you're not interested, that's fine, though if you have any suggestions on how the article could be improved, let me know or feel free to make them as you see fit. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 16:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I've never done a GA review and I would rather not make an attempt at one. I've done some minor fixes to formatting though.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the improvements-- I had no idea about the Nihongo3 template. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 17:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)