User talk:Saayiit

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

I dream of horses @ 23:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookies and the reminder about signing my posts. I have mostly being looking for vandalism so far (that which hasn't been picked up by ClueBot)

I have noticed that 76.98.54.163 has been making lots of changes to the names of people in articles. These changes are never cited and (where I have been able to reliably establish them) contradict known fact.

Have a look... [1] ...what do you think?

I not sure what do do exactly. It seems a bit bold to assume this is all vandalism.

One of the principles on Wikipedia is everybody starts out with an

assumption of good faith until and unless there is evidence to the contrary. In this example, I don't know if this is really malicious, so I'll assume that it isn't. --I dream of horses @ 23:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah I guess I'll have to give 'em the benefit of doubt. Its difficult to verify the accuracy biographical details, as so much of what appears on the internet appears to be copied from wikipedia! I stick to undoing the changes that disagree with reliable sources, and leave the rest to be cleaned up by future, better informed editors. Thanks again for the tips and the reading list. Saayiit (talk) 00:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good thing you asked. You're quite welcome! --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill in the blanks in the templated warning and sign it when you use one of these, like the incomplete one you posted at [2]. Thanks!Edison (talk) 00:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. That was about Perfume by the way.

Please sign your posts with four tildes like this:~~~~. What is with that IP editor and linking every other word as well as random phrases, and the same word multiple times? Please watch their contributions to see if they resume the same pattern of edits after the 72 hour block I have applied. Edison (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sign my posts, must remember. I know, very strange behaviour. I'll keep an eye out for any further activity. Saayiit (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your welcome!!!--Apusc (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. I actually was planning on leaving something to notify the user on their talk page, however I couldn't find any templates that went along with their mistake and just reverted it and took the easy way out. I felt kind of guilty about it, because I knew he/she wasn't trying to vandalize or intentionally make the page longer than it should be and probably didn't know any better either. I'll try not to let my laziness get in the way of things. TheArguer (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current