User talk:Saibabasatsang

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SaiMail, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://bayarea.eknazar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=26053. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SaiMail (disambiguation), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://bayarea.eknazar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=26053. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Saipatham, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ask-usa.org/sribabuji/saipatham.sai. As a copyright violation, Saipatham appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Saipatham has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Saipatham and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Saipatham
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Saipatham
  .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 10:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saipatham

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Saipatham, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No

reliable

third-party sources given to assert notability of subject.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. §FreeRangeFrog 10:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Article on Sri_Sainathuni_Sarath_Babuji

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Sainathuni_Sarath_Babuji

source from http://saibaba.com/saiweb/subMenuRedirect.sai?menuId=47&subMenuId=59 has no copy rights, we added content in Saibaba.com Website.

Proposed deletion of Sri Sainathuni Sarath Babuji

Proposed deletion of Sri Sainathuni Sarath Babuji

The article Sri Sainathuni Sarath Babuji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extreme POV/COI, such as would require a complete re-write to turn into a WP acceptable article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]